Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Ms Sarah Morgan Q.C. & Mr Andrzej Bojarski (instructed by Local Authority Solicitors) for the Applicant Mr Alex Verdan Q.C & Mr John Tughan for the 1st Respondent Mr Charles Geekie Q.C. & Ms Sorrel Dixon for the 2nd Respondent Ms Fawzia King for the 3rd & 4th Respondents Hearing dates: 28th May � 30th May 2012, 1st June 2012 ____________________
He agreed his role involved training of younger doctors. In his letter to the Local Authority dated 21.9.09 he records K telephoning him at about 5pm to inform him of the case and he continues "In a general way, K reassured me that the necessary action would be taken, and that A would not be discharged home that night." Dr Croft recalls taking this call when he was at the Child Development Centre about two miles away from the hospital. He did not work on Thursdays and was next due into the hospital on Friday.
The bruising on the labia majora present in September 2011 included a 'V' shaped mark that was not consistent with an injury from an erect penis. However, in this case it remains possible that the injuries were a 'straddle injury' caused by falling on an object in the bathroom.'
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.