Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
      For the sake of continuity and ease of reading I shall hereafter refer to the parties as they stood before the First-tier Tribunal. The Secretary of State is once again "the Respondent" and JMK is "the Appellant".
      The Respondent appeals to the Upper Tribunal against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Loke ("the Judge"), promulgated on 6 June 2023. By that decision the Judge allowed the Appellant's appeal against the Respondent's refusal of her protection and human rights claims.
      The Appellant is a citizen of the Democratic Republic of Congo. In brief summary, she claimed to have been involved with political activities in the DRC on behalf of the UDPS and that this would place her at risk on return. She also claimed to have undertaken certain political activities whilst in the United Kingdom. Finally, the Appellant had provided evidence indicating that she suffered from significant mental health problems and this too was put forward as a basis for international protection, it being said that there was a risk of gender-based violence.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.