Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Digital Transcription by Epiq Europe Ltd, Lower Ground, 46 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1JE Web: www.epiqglobal.com/en-gb/ Email: [email protected] (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
MS CAMPBELL-BRUNTON (as instructed by Covent Garden Family Law) appeared on behalf of the Applicant father MR CROSTHWAITE (as instructed by Osbornes Law) appeared on behalf of the Respondent mother JUDGMENT (Approved) ____________________
Thirdly, consent must be clear and unequivocal, but it does not have to be given in writing or in any particular terms. It may be manifested by words and/or inferred from conduct. Fourthly, a person may consent but with the gravest reservations. That does not render the consent invalid if the evidence is otherwise sufficient to establish it.
Dr Gamble. I will very briefly summarise the short evidence I heard and my observations on the credibility and reliability of the witness evidence.
Where therefore the evidence of the parents has differed before this court, particularly on the issue of consent, for all of those reasons I prefer and accept the evidence of mother.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.