Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is the Respondent�s appeal against the decision of Judge Scott made following a hearing at Taylor House on 21 st August 2014.
The Appellant is a citizen of Bangladesh born on 10 th December 1985. He arrived in the UK on 16 January 2010 with entry clearance as a student until 31 December 2011. On 29 December 2011 he applied for further leave to remain, also as a student, but was refused on 25 February 2012. On 29 September 2012 he made an application for leave to remain as a Tier 4 (general) student which was �voided as an inappropriate application�. He became appeal rights exhausted on 25 October 2012.
The Appellant then made a further application for leave to remain on 19 December 2012. He was refused under Paragraph 245ZX(m) of the Rules, which states that the applicant will be refused if he is in the UK in breach of immigration laws except that any period of overstaying for a period of 28 days or less will be disregarded.
He appealed against the decision. His appeal was allowed by Judge Scott on the basis that the Appellant had not been informed by the Secretary of State that a previous application had been rejected as invalid.
Under Section 82(2)(e) of the Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 Act there is a right of appeal to the Tribunal against a decision to refuse to vary a person�s leave to enter or remain in the UK if when the variation takes effect, the person has no leave to enter or remain.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.