Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
R (on the application of ZM and SK) v The London Borough of Croydon (Dental age assessment) [2016] UKUT 559 (IAC)
Mr I Wise QC and Mr C McCarthy instructed by Bhatia Best Solicitors, appeared on behalf of both Applicants.
Mr J Swirsky, instructed by London Borough of Croydon Legal Department, appeared on behalf of the Respondent.
"Having rejected the three reasons relied on by the judge, I am satisfied that the judge should have made the order sought by Croydon. It was reasonably necessary to enable it to defend the challenge to its age assessment. Y's refusal to give his consent was unreasonable."
"The primary data source for DAA should be a RDS based on a clearly defined racial or ethnic group."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.