Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Appellants born on 1 st January 1972 and 21 st April 1978 respectively are citizens of Pakistan and are husband and wife. The Appellants were unrepresented and the Respondent was represented by Miss Johnstone, a Home Office Presenting Officer. The Sponsor in this case, Mr Latif, brother of the Appellants was present.
The Appellants had made application for entry clearance as family visitors to the United Kingdom to visit Mr Latif. On 3 rd July 2013 the Respondent had refused those applications. The matter had been appealed and heard by First-tier Tribunal Judge Foudy sitting at Manchester on 29 th April 2014. She had dismissed the appeal.
Permission to appeal was granted on 18 th June 2014 and came before me on 15 th August 2014 to decide whether or not an error of law had been made in this case. I found for reasons provided in the earlier determination that an error of law had been made, set aside that decision and issued directions for remaking that decision.
The matter comes back before me to remake that decision in accordance with the directions set.
As the Sponsor was present I firstly explained to him the nature of the proceedings and the way they would be conducted.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.