Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the sake of convenience, I refer to the appellant as the Entry Clearance Officer and the respondent as �the claimant.�
I am satisfied that notice of hearing was given to the claimant on 30 th May 2014 in which the date, time and place of the hearing is set out. He was also notified that if his representative did not attend the hearing, the Tribunal may determine the appeal in his absence.
The claimant is a national of Syria, who applied to visit his friends in the UK to do some shopping for a period of ten days. His application was refused by the Entry Clearance Officer on 2 nd October 2013. He was not satisfied that the claimant is a genuine visitor, or that he would return to the UAE at the end of the visit.
The Entry Clearance Officer noted that the claimant had previously travelled to the UK and that he had met the requirements as a Tier 1 Post-Study Migrant visitor. However, each case has to be decided on its own merits. His last UK visa had been issued three years ago. He claimed that he was employed as a legal researcher from January 2012, earning �1,930 a month. His bank statement showed deposits not commensurate with his claimed salary.
The notice of refusal stated that his right of appeal was limited to the grounds referred to in s.84(1)(c) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.