Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This appeal comes before the Upper Tribunal as the result of permission granted by First-tier Tribunal Judge Kimnell in the following terms -
Permission is sought [by the Entry Clearance Officer] to appeal against the determination of First Tier Tribunal Judge Shimmin , promulgated 4 th April 2014, allowing an appeal against the refusal of entry clearance as a partner, or spouse.
The determination was not served on the respondent, and came to attention only on the day of the application for permission was made on 12 th June 2014. I therefore extend the time for giving notice so as to place the application �in time�.
Paragraph 18 of the determination records the fact that the issues in the case were identified at the commencement of the hearing. The issues included the adequacy of the proposed accommodation and whether or not the documents provided by the appellant were in the specified form. The judge makes no specific finding on either matter, and provides no reason for the conclusion that the appellant satisfies the Immigration Rules.
The terms of the grant reflect the assertions that were made by the Entry Clearance Officer in the application for permission to appeal �
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.