Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is an appeal against the determination of First-tier Tribunal Judge Andonian, promulgated on 3 rd September 2018, following a hearing at Taylor House on 17 th August 2018. In the determination, the judge dismissed the appeal of the Appellant, whereupon the Appellant subsequently applied for, and was granted, permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal, and thus the matter comes before me.
The Appellant is a male, a citizen of Pakistan, and was born on 3 rd September 1986. He appealed against the decision of the Respondent.
The judge was not satisfied that the Appellant was in a credible relationship as maintained. This is clear from his concluding remarks. These are as follows:
The judge was of the view that to take the five year period as beginning from September 2009 when the cohabitation started, and not from 11 th August 2011 as maintained by the Secretary of State, would not be technically correct as this would
"... make a mockery of the Regulations and the law, if the start date for cohabitation was the date when the Appellant states he first started cohabiting from September 2009 to September 2014, because this would imply that anything that happened after and between August 2011 when the residence card was issued and always 2016 when it expired, some of the period in between was irrelevant in terms of what happened to the relationship, as the five years had been clocked up by September 2014" (see paragraph 14).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.