Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Although is an appeal by the Secretary of State, I shall refer to the parties as they were in the First-tier Tribunal.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant and/or any member of his family , likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant and/or any member of his family . Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             In November 1977, the appellant, aged 4, entered the UK for settlement with his mother. He has been convicted of a number of criminal offences and in November 2015 he was sentenced to two years' imprisonment for assault occasioning actual bodily harm ('ABH') on his then partner Ms U, with whom he has two children D and E. The appellant was given a 5 year restraining order and on 26 August 2016 a deportation order was signed.
             Judge Galloway found that the situation had significantly changed since the decision of Judge Davies. She concluded the risk of re-offending was now low and the appellant had a genuine and subsisting parental relationship with his children, Z, D and E. The judge considered the report of Dr L, a chartered psychologist, and attached significant weight to the evidence of Ms J, the appellant and his witnesses. The judge found that the appellant's deportation would be unduly harsh on his children.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.