Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
LORD JUSTICE MUSTILL LORD JUSTICE BUTLER-SLOSS and LORD JUSTICE BELDAM BETWEEN: ____________________
(Transcript of the Shorthand Notes of the Association of Official Shorthandwriters Ltd., Room 392 Royal Courts of Justice and 2 New Square, Lincoln's Inn, London WC2A 3RU. Tel: 071 405 9884/5).
MR. ROBIN SHAWCROSS (instructed by Messrs. Johnsons, Solicitors, Lymington, Hampshire, S041 9AL) appeared on behalf of the Defendants (Appellants). MR. JEREMY NICHOLSON (instructed by Messrs. Edwards & Bodley, Solicitors, Christchurch, Dorset, BH23 1QD) appeared on behalf of the Plaintiffs (Respondents). ____________________
LORD JUSTICE MUSTILL : I have asked Lord Justice Beldam to deliver the first judgment on this appeal.
The first defendant's experience in styling ladies' hair was cosmopolitan. From time to time he had worked in salons in Hamburg, in Stockholm, in Paris, in Lausanne and in Mayfair. He had also taken part in competitions at international level. According to witnesses he had a personality which reflected his experience and, as the judge found, he had built up at Exeter Road a very good business.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.