Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant and any member of his family, is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant and any member of his family. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             On 16 th June 2023, I set aside the decision in relation to the findings on the Section 72 certificate but upheld the decision on article 3 grounds in the following terms:
' The Judge erred materially for the reasons identified. I set aside only the findings and conclusion in relation to the Section 72 certificate (and by extension the conclusion on the Refugee Convention) pursuant to Section 12(2)(a) of the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (TCE 2007). The findings and conclusion in relation to Article 3 will stand.'
             The sole issue before me was whether the appellant had managed to rebut the presumption under Section 72 bearing in mind the appellant had been convicted of a particularly serious crime (signified by his conviction and imprisonment for 10 years) and that he constituted a danger to the community. The appellant was released from prison in 2021.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.