Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Applicant in person Mr Andrew Bagchi QC (instructed under the Public Access Scheme) for the Respondent Hearing date: 20 March 2015 ____________________
The order provided that otherwise the order of 22 March 2013 and, in particular, the order under section 91(14) should remain in force.
The father agreed that, as a matter of historical analysis, historical fact, Mr Bagchi was correct. I continued:
Note 1 �I fucked your wife in a hotel � and we fucked 3 times that afternoon � what more do you want to know that you don�t already?� and �We fucked lots and we both enjoyed it. What you going to do now?� [Back]
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.