Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is an appeal by the Entry Clearance Officer (ECO) in Islamabad against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Hillis) to allow the respondent�s appeal from the refusal of his application for entry clearance as the spouse of a person who is settled in the United Kingdom.
Mr Diwnycz sought to persuade me that the judge�s arithmetic was incorrect. He was not however able to substantiate that claim because he had not brought his notes with him. This is not in any event the basis upon which permission to appeal was granted. The real point of the appeal (and that for which permission has been granted) lies in the fact that the judge appears wholly to have overlooked the evidential requirements of Appendix FM-SE.
In respect of salaried employment in the UK (except where paragraph 9 applies), all of the following evidence must be provided:
(i) a period of 6 months prior to the date of application if the person has been
(ii) any period of salaried employment in the period of 12 months prior to the date
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.