Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             I set out a number of findings made by Judge Brannan (hereinafter, the 'Judge') in his decision promulgated on 22 nd May 2023 and where such findings were unaffected by the errors of law which this Tribunal had previously found. The Judge had noted that there was a dispute about the level of the involvement that the appellant had with various of his children and former partners. The Judge proceeded to set out the facts and findings, which I recite.
             These findings were as follows:
"9. The Appellant is a national of Jamaica born on 19 November 1984. He entered the UK on 13 April 2001 when he was 16. He was granted indefinite leave to remain on 12 June 2003 as a dependent on his stepfather.
In November 2006 the Appellant had his first child ('Child 1') with the first of his ex-partners ('EX 1'). Child 1 is a boy. According to the statement of the Appellant's mother, the Appellant's relationship with EX 1 began in 2004 and she moved into the family home during her pregnancy. She goes on to say that the relationship broke down soon after Child 1 was born.
On 17 April 2007 the Appellant was convicted of possessing controlled drug with intent to supply - class A - Heroin, and sentenced to 9 months of imprisonment suspended for 2 years.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.