Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent: Mr B Ali, solicitor Advocate, instructed by Kilic & Kilic, solicitors
I have considered whether any parties require the protection of an anonymity direction. No anonymity direction was made previously in respect of the Appellants. Having considered all the circumstances and evidence I do not consider it necessary to make an anonymity direction.
The Secretary of State for the Home Department brings this appeal, but in order to avoid confusion, the parties are referred to as they were in the First Tier Tribunal. This is an appeal by the Secretary of State against the decision of First Tier Tribunal Judge Iqbal promulgated on 13 April 2015 which dismissed both appellants' appeals under the Immigration Rules but allowed the appellants' appeals on Article 8 ECHR grounds.
The second appellant entered the UK as a visitor. She applied for indefinite leave to remain on 10 August 2012 as the dependant relative of her grandmother (who lives in the UK). That application was refused on 29 May 2013 but she too was granted leave to remain outside the Immigration Rules until 28 November 2013 to allow arrangements to be made for her return to Venezuela.
On 12 April 2013, the first appellant made a further application for leave to remain in the UK. On 25 November 2013, the second appellant made a further application for leave to remain in the UK. Both applications were refused by the respondent on 30 January 2014.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.