Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(i) that the First-tier Tribunal judge arguably failed to make findings on whether the appellant met the financial requirements of the Immigration Rules;
(ii) that it was arguable that the judge reached an inconsistent finding in that he found that the respondent's decision was not in accordance with the Immigration rules yet dismissed the appeal;
(iii) that it was arguable that the judge gave insufficient or no reasons for rejecting the sponsor's claim of a genuine relationship yet finding the sponsor to be 'generally credible';
(iv) it was arguable that the judge gave insufficient consideration to the sponsor's father's evidence.
The appellant applied for entry clearance as a spouse in May 2014. The application was refused for the reasons set out in the decision dated 9 th December 2014 namely
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.