Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
HIS HONOUR JUDGE HICKINBOTTOM SITTING AS AN ADDITIONAL JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT BETWEEN ____________________
ANDREW BUTLER (instructed by Edwin Coe LLP) appeared for the Claimant. MARTIN CHAMBERLAIN (instructed by TfL Legal) appeared for the Defendants. ____________________
In short, those provisions meant that new taxis had to be manufactured to a specification that complied with Euro 3 in respect of emission limits, and taxis already on the road were required to meet that standard by some form of modification by July 2008. By virtue of Condition 5, any modification of course had to be approved by the PCO.
He (Mr Davies) sent an email in similar terms to Mr Coyle and Mr Vincent that same day.
There is reference there to the proposed system relying on the original EGR valve as manufactured, but no specific reference to the modified Eco-Power system recycling gases other than through the combustion chamber. Mr Coyle responded the same day, as follows:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.