Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(i) The respondent's decision dated 21 December 2015, refusing the appellant's application for a residence card.
(iv) The appellant's grounds of appeal to the UT, stated in the application for permission to appeal dated 3 July 2017.
In reply Mr Shoaib said that the sponsor spoke little French of Flemish but enough to run the business; it had been run on a paperless basis; as the bank accounts had been closed, no records could now be obtained; and that the Belgian government records of starting and closing the business, and of residence cards, were "clear evidence of trading".
The first ground of appeal, "irrational findings of facts", is only disagreement. It specifies nothing which might amount to error on a point of law.
The second ground, "erroneous assessment of evidence", says that evidence was overlooked, but relies on reference to evidence of registration not of trading, and does not grapple with the distinction between the two.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.