Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including his name or address, likely to lead members of the public to identify him. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court.
            The appellant is a national of Iran and an ethnic Kurd. He sought asylum based on political activity in Iran and in the UK. The SSHD refused his claim. FtT Judge Prudham dismissed his appeal by a decision promulgated on 9 February 2023.
            On 26 April 2023, UT Judge Reeds granted permission to appeal to the UT.
            By a decision dated 28 September and issued on 19 October 2023, which should be read herewith, UT Judge Norton-Taylor at [13] set aside the decision of the FtT "only in relation to the question of the appellant's sur place activities"; at [14-15], retained the case in the UT, and explained the scope of the re-making of the decision; and, finally, gave directions.
            A transfer order has been made to enable decision-making to be completed by a differently constituted tribunal. Hence, the matter comes before me.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.