Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Judicial Review of a Decision by the Respondent to Certify a Claim for Asylum by the Petitioner
[2 ] Meantime, on 8 May 2001 , the petitioner had submitted another claim for asylum in a different name, TK, born in 1975, on the basis that he was a national of Iraq . The respondent declined to treat this as a fresh claim on the basis that it had been discovered that he was the same person as had made the earlier application. The claim was refused on 26 November 2002 .
"16...you have already had your fabricated asylum claim considered and re-considered by Immigration Judges, and they have been stated to be fabricated claims....[Y]our current asylum claim is a fabrication intended to delay/prevent your deportation from the UK. It is not believed that you are either Iraqi, [TK], or that your date of birth is 02/05/1975 , as you now claim.
17...you are an Iranian national who has concocted an asylum claim in a different identity to delay his removal from the United Kingdom . Since it has not been accepted that you are Iraqi, we would seek to deport you to Iran . As such, your asylum claim on the basis of your Iraqi nationality has not been given any merit...
18...You have not demonstrated enough evidence of your practise of the Christian faith, or of knowledge of this religion, for it to be believed that you are a convert to the Christian faith as you have claimed .
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.