Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Andrew McFarlane (instructed by Parker Bird Solicitors) for the Applicant The Respondent acted in person Hearing dates : 18 and 19 November 2003 ____________________
i) An application by the mother of 20 January 2003 to set aside an order I had made on 5 November 2002 relating to contact.
iii) The mother's application of 28 August 2003 for enforcement of an order for telephone contact.
iv) An application by the father of 17 October 2003 for leave to remove Virad from the jurisdiction to Shanghai for a period of 3 years.
i) Is the father's application genuine in the sense that it is not motivated by some selfish desire to exclude the mother from Virad's life?
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.