Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellants: Ms R Chapman, Counsel instructed by Bostanci & Rahman solicitors
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the Appellant is granted anonymity. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the Appellant or members of his family, likely to lead members of the public to identify the Appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
            The Appellant appeals against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Graves dated 2 April 2023 ("the Decision") dismissing the Appellant's appeal against the Respondent's decision dated 9 May 2022 refusing his protection and human rights claims. This is the Appellant's second appeal, his first having been dismissed by Immigration Judge Lingham by a decision promulgated on 15 March 2010 ("the Previous Decision").
            The issues before Judge Graves were stated to be the Appellant's age, nationality and ethnicity as a Kurd, and that he had been called to do military service and had failed to respond. He also contended that conscientious objectors form a particular social group ("PSG") in Turkey. The Appellant also relied on family members having been recognised as refugees.
            The Appellant raises two grounds of appeal under the following headings:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.