Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The grounds seeking leave to appeal are succinct. It is asserted that Judge Monson misdirected himself because he considered the circumstances at the date of the refusal decision and not the date of the hearing as regards Article 8 and in so doing did not take into account the incidents that occurred according to the sponsor evidence in February and March 2015.
The challenge to the decision and the grant of permission misunderstands the decision of the House of Lords in AS (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 32 and I refer specifically to paragraph 19. The judge considered the evidence nevertheless in relation to incidents in 2015 and he found as follows at paragraph 43:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.