Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
In granting permission Judge Foudy noted that the respondent�s grounds argued that the judge had given insufficient reasons for finding that the appellant intended to leave the United Kingdom after a short visit. Judge Foudy noted that the judge had referred to the British citizenship of the appellant�s children and their ability to enter the United Kingdom as they wished but had not explained why he found that the appellant met the Immigration Rules.
After reading the statement Mr Kandola conceded that the respondent�s grounds of application were wrong to suggest that the judge�s findings were based on speculation when there had been the appellant�s statement before him. Nevertheless, he indicated that it could be argued that the appellant had no incentive to return because she had no other family members in Algeria.
Mr Miah submitted that the judge had given adequate reasons for his conclusion that the appellant would return to Algeria after her visit because the judge�s conclusion was clearly not based on speculation but the statement evidence of the appellant, herself.
After considering the matter for a few moments I indicated that I was not satisfied that the determination showed an error on a point of law and could stand. My reasons for that conclusion follow.
The determination of the First-tier Tribunal does not show an error on a point of law and shall stand.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.