Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
On appeal from the First-tier Tribunal (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber)
The appeal considers potentially significant issues around the application of the test in s.20(3) of the Equality Act 2010 ("the Act" or "the 2010 Act"), as modified by schedule 13, particularly in its application to special schools.
On 21 March 2023 I gave the Responsible Body permission to appeal and directed that the effect of the FtT's order be suspended.
The remote hearing proceeded without any technical difficulty and Mr Cullen confirmed at the end that he had been able to hear the judge throughout and that there were no further points he wished to add.
My own researches while preparing this decision led me to a relevant-seeming point (concerning the predecessor legislation) which had not been raised at the hearing.� Accordingly, the parties were given the opportunity to make submissions on it.� Mr Cullen on behalf of the Responsible Body did so; Mr R elected not to.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.