Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Whilst this is an appeal by the Entry Clearance Officer (ECO), for convenience I will refer to the parties in the determination as they appeared before the First-tier Tribunal
The appellant is a national of Canada. She is the mother of Anuja Ranjan, a British national and the sponsor in this appeal. The appellant applied for entry clearance as the Adult Dependant Relative of the sponsor under paragraph EC-DR of Appendix FM of the Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules , HC 395 (the Immigration Rules). The Entry Clearance Officer (ECO) refused the application under EC-DR.1.1 (d) with reference to E-ECDR.2.4 and 2.5 of Appendix FM. Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Cohen allowed the appeal. The Secretary of State now appeals with permission to this Tribunal.
The relevant provision of Appendix FM for the purposes of this appeal are as follows;
�E-ECDR.2.4. The applicant � must as a result of age, illness or disability require long-term personal care to perform everyday tasks.
E-ECDR.2.5. The applicant � must be unable, even with the practical and financial help of the sponsor, to obtain the required level of care in the country where they are living, because-
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.