Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Nichoas Vineall KC and James Hatt (instructed by Harcus Parker Limited) for the Claimants in FL-2022-000011 Derrick Dale KC and Teniola Onabanjo (instructed by Leigh Day) for the Claimants in FL-2022-000012 Alain Choo Choy KC, Mehdi Baiou and Simon Gilson (instructed by Wallace LLP) for the RGL Claimants Richard Handyside KC, Rupert Allen and Gillian Hughes (instructed by Clifford Chance LLP) for the Defendants Hearing dates: 19th and 20th December 2022 ____________________
"The matters set out below for the purposes of CPR 19.11 are intended to identify the high level GLO issues to assist in the management of the GLO, and are not intended as a substitute for particularised pleadings. These GLO issues will be likely to require revision and review as the litigation progresses, including when pleadings are finalised. Accordingly, no party makes or is deemed to make any admission or concession by reason of the matters set out below.
"Whether any such breaches as may be established have caused loss to the Claimants or some of them (and if so which), and, if so, in what amounts; and what compensation, if any, is payable to the Claimants, or some of them (and if so which), pursuant to s.138D."
"In my judgment, it is one thing for the court to make directions which enable the Claimants' legal team to stir further interest in the claim but quite another to require the Defendant to do so against its own interests as a litigant over disputed claims."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.