Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The parties are as described above, but the rest of this determination refers to them as they were in the First-tier Tribunal.
The appellant is a citizen of Sri Lanka and a refugee in Germany. He applied to enter the UK as the spouse of a refugee under Part 11 of the Immigration Rules. The ECO refused that application for the following reasons:
(ii) there was insufficient evidence of maintaining a family unit with his wife and two children (both also lawfully in the UK), and the children are adults;
(iv) there is no provision under the European Agreement on the Transfer of Responsibility for Refugees (EATRR) for transfer of status;
(v) the appellant sought exercise of discretion in his favour, but had not applied under the Immigration Rules as a spouse; and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.