Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
FORMTEXT FFFFFFFF0000000000000500540065007800740031000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
[1 ] This action, raised by summons, has two conclusions. The first is for payment by the defender to the pursuer of the sum of �20,000. The second is for the expenses of the action. The summons commences with the description:
The pursuer is a lady aged 36. The defender is a man, whose age is not given, but who would appear to be a mature individual. They are unrelated. The summons bears to be raised in terms of Chapter 43 of the Rules of Court.
[2 ] The statement of claim sets out in paragraph 4 a set of circumstances in which the defender's conduct is said to have scared and distressed the pursuer. It includes averments to the effect that the defender contacted the pursuer on various occasions, saying things such as that he wished to marry her and that unless she agreed to see him he would destroy her career. It concludes with the sentence that:
"The defender's course of conduct towards the pursuer from in or about the summer of 2003 was such as to amount to harassment."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.