Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Decision: � The appeal is allowed.� The decision of the Independent Safeguarding Authority dated 12 April 2011, whereby it included the Appellant in the Adults� Barred List, is set aside and the case is remitted to the Independent Safeguarding Authority for a new decision to be made by it.
The Respondent now supports the appeal and submits that it should be allowed on the papers, to the extent of remitting the case back to it, on the ground that, in reaching its conclusion, it failed to have regard to statutory guidance.�
(b)� it appears to IBB that it is appropriate to include the person in the list.�
(a)� conduct which endangers a vulnerable adult or is likely to endanger a �vulnerable adult;
(b)� conduct which, if repeated against or in relation to a vulnerable adult, could endanger that adult or would be likely to endanger him;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.