Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
JUDGEMENT of Sheriff N.A.Ross in the cause FARRANS (CONSTRUCTION) LIMITED PURSUER against GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL DEFENDER
Glasgow, 12 February 2013: The Sheriff, having resumed consideration of the cause, finds in fact as follows:-
The pursuer timeously completed and submitted a pre-qualification questionnaire (the "PQQ") under cover of a letter dated 22 June 2007. The pursuer timeously tendered to carry out the works prior to the closing date of 4 April 2008. Accurate copies of the PQQ and tender are lodged at 5/426 of process. The PQQ and tender contained information relating to the pursuer which were certified by the pursuer to be accurate to the best of their knowledge.
The pursuer proposed, unknown to the defender, to utilise the assets and resources of Northstone in order to carry out the works. The pursuer had no resources, staff, plant, equipment or any other necessary assets to carry out the work. The defender was unaware of this. The pursuer had no contractual or other means of enforcing the performance of the works by Northstone or any other party.
The pursuer proposed to utilise the resources of Northstone and carry out no work itself. It did not propose to enter any formal sub-contract with Northstone or any other company, and would therefore have undertaken to complete the works without any contractual means of enforcing performance by Northstone or any other party.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.