Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
SIR JAMES MUNBY PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION LADY JUSTICE ARDEN and LORD JUSTICE SINGH ____________________
The other matter relates to something which the judge referred to (para 36) as an example of the high level of tension surrounding the proceedings:
Whilst readily accepting the premise we do question the conclusion. If the order made by the judge has already so broken down, that might be thought to raise at least a question as to whether his order was right.
i) In his careful survey of the wide constellation of cultural and religious concerns, the judge ultimately lost sight of the paramountcy principle.
ii) The judge failed to evaluate why indirect contact and the giving of narratives to the children about their father's transgender status was in the children's best interests and direct contact was not.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.