Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Gayatri Sarathy (instructed by Good Law Project) for the Appellant The Respondent did not attend and was unrepresented Nathan Roberts (appointed by HM Attorney General) as Advocate to the Court Hearing dates: 8th and 9th July 2025 ____________________
(a) provide for applications to be made for a GRC, for the criteria to be applied and the evidence to be provided: Sections 1, 2 and 3;
(b) established a Gender Recognition Panel to determine those applications and provided for appeals from decisions of the Panel: Section 1(3) and Schedule 1;
(c) provide for the consequences of the issue of a GRC, including the creation and maintenance of the Gender Recognition Register, described in Schedule 3;
(d) provide for a prohibition on disclosure of protected information about a person who has made an application: Section 22; and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.