Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Respondent to whom I shall refer as "the Applicant" is a citizen of Pakistan, born on 17 August 1983. On 18 July 2012 she entered with leave as a visitor expiring on 4 December 2012.
On 21 October 2006 she married Shahzada Shahid Saeed in Pakistan. He is a British citizen. They have two children both born in Pakistan in 2007 and 2010 who are both British citizens. She lives with her husband and her children in the Midlands.
On 29 September 2014 the Applicant applied for a Derivative Residence Card as the primary carer of British citizens resident in the United Kingdom by way of reference to Reg. 15A of the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006 as amended (the 2006 Regs.).
On 15 December 2014 the Appellant (the SSHD) refused the application for a Derivative Residence Card and by a letter of 15 December 2014 gave her reasons. This letter was not before the First-tier Tribunal Judge and was only produced at the hearing before me upon my request.
The Applicant was not directly entitled to a right of residence under the Citizens' Directive (2004/38/EC) because she was not a citizen of another Member State and her husband was a British citizen and had not exercised the right of freedom of movement within the European Union.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.