Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
At the request of the Home Office, I have decided to determine this appeal without a hearing.
The appellant is a citizen of Pakistan and the husband of a British national. He sought entry clearance by way of an application submitted prior to changes made to the Immigration Rules which were introduced on 9 July 2012. In order to meet the English language requirements, the appellant submitted two English language certificates, one meeting the requirements for listening and the other meeting the requirements for speaking. The two elements were the subject of two separate certificates. The respondent took issue with the provision of two certificates.
By a letter dated 25 February 2014, a member of the Specialist Appeals Team on behalf of the Secretary of State notified the tribunal in the following terms
"Following receipt of the application for permission to appeal, and having consulted policy advice on the use of the multiple English language certificates prior to the change in the Rules on 1 October 2013, the respondent does not wish to challenge this further, and considers that the case should be returned to the ECO to consider issuing a visa.
It is considered to be Tribunal can issue a determination to this effect without the need for a further oral hearing.""
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.