Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
       The appellant is a national of Uganda, born on 3 August 1933.
       She came to the United Kingdom on 23 March 2002 on a visit Visa, valid until 25 August 2005. Her daughter and grandchildren lived here.
       The appellant overstayed the terms of her visit Visa. She subsequently made various unsuccessful applications for leave to remain to regularise her situation .On 16 July 2019 she lodged further submissions relating to her last application of 18 February 2016. These were rejected and her appeal was heard by First-tier Tribunal Judge Hyland at Hatton Cross on 16 May 2022 via the CVP platform. Her appeal was dismissed.
       The parties were represented and the appellant took part through an interpreter. There was also evidence from her daughter and grandson. She has a total of six grandchildren. There was a bundle of documents in support of the appeal.
       The judge began by considering the application of paragraph 276 ADE(1)(vi) of the immigration rules which deals with private life. The issue arising, where the person had lived in the United Kingdom for less than 20 years, was whether there would be very significant obstacles to their integration into their home country .
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.