Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
            Although the appellant in this appeal is the Secretary of State, it is more convenient to refer to the parties as they were before the First-tier Tribunal. I shall therefore refer in this decision to Mr Rana as "the Appellant" and to the Secretary of State as "the Respondent".
            The First-tier Tribunal did not make an anonymity order and I saw no reason to do so.
             Permission to appeal was granted in extremely broad terms. The Appellant has not filed a Rule 24 response. Mr Deller provide a skeleton argument in advance of the hearing, although in the event, he did not need to refer to it at the hearing.
             Mr Chohan agreed. There followed some discussion as to how to resolve the matter. One option would be for the Respondent to withdraw her decision, but the representatives preferred an alternative approach, which was to uphold the judge's decision on the basis he had made the necessary factual findings to enable the Respondent to facilitate the Appellant's residence as an extended family member.
         The EEA Regulations, when in force, read in relevant part as follows:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.