Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This decision is made under section 11 of the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal did not involve the making of an error of law.
The appellant brought this appeal with the permission of a First-tier Tribunal judge on the question of whether the First-tier Tribunal (�F-tT�) erred in law when it did not adjourn the oral hearing after the appellant left the hearing abruptly.� The Secretary of State does not support the appeal.
The appeal related to the Work Capability Assessment, on which the appellant had only scored 6 points.� This was not enough to allow the conversion of her existing entitlement to incapacity benefits to Employment and Support Allowance on the basis that she had limited capability for work.
The hearing began at 15:40. There was no presenting officer, but the appellant was present and represented. �At 16:15, the Record of Proceedings shows that the tribunal judge asked the appellant about conflicting remarks in her evidence.� The appellant�s response, her next actions and the F-tT�s impressions are recorded in the Record of Proceedings as:�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.