Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
       The appellant is a citizen of Iraq of Kurdish ethnicity born on 2 December 1965. She appeals, with permission, against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal dismissing her appeal against the respondent's decision to refuse her asylum and human rights claims.
       Permission was granted in the First-tier Tribunal on 13 April 2022, on the following basis:
"2. The grounds assert that the Judge erred in the assessment of credibility in a number of respects (paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 17, 18 and 20).
The judge has given cogent reasons for rejecting the Appellant's evidence including giving detailed findings as to why items of evidence she has been accused of ignoring were not reliable. The challenge to the credibility findings does not engage with the details of these findings which undermine the arguments to a significant extent and the grounds do not consider the impact of Devaseelan which the judge correctly applied.
4.The grounds also assert that the judge took the wrong approach to the feasibility of return and relocation for Kurdish Iraqis, moving around within Iraq and the challenges of obtaining identity documents (7, 9-11, 13-16 and 19).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.