Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
              This is an appeal against a decision of the Secretary of State dated 26 October 2021 to refuse a human rights claim made by the appellant on 24 December 2020. The appeal is brought under Section 82(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ("the 2002 Act").
              The appellant is a citizen of Bangladesh born in 1964. He is now 59. He arrived in the United Kingdom in September 2008 with leave as a visitor valid until 1 March 2009. He overstayed. In 2010 he attempted, unsuccessfully, to regularise his status. He has been invited to claim asylum by the Secretary of State but has chosen not to do so. It was against that background that the appellant made the human rights claim to the Secretary of State on 24 December 2020.
              In the error of law decision, a number of findings of Judge Sweet's were preserved. Those findings were set out at para. 18 of that decision and were as follows:
(a)            First, that the appellant was adamant that he did not wish to pursue an asylum claim.
(b)           Secondly, that the appellant's GP had confirmed that he suffers or experiences diabetes and dementia.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.