Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
By a decision dated 1 June 2018, I found that the First-tier Tribunal had erred in law such that its decision fell to be set aside:
Both parties agreed that the judge incorrectly relied on the Upper Tribunal decision in Kareem (Proxy Marriages - EU Law) [2014] UKUT 24 (IAC) . Kareem has been overruled in the Court of Appeal (see Awuku [2017] EWCA Civ 178 ). In the circumstances, I set aside the First-tier Tribunal decision. None of the findings of fact shall stand.
As regards disposal, I see no reason why this decision cannot be remade in the Upper Tribunal. I refer to [21 - 23] of Awuku:
I make the following directions with a view to disposing of the appeal in the Upper Tribunal.
A. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal promulgation on 24 November 2016 is set aside. None of the findings of fact shall stand.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.