Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Secretary of State for the Home Department appeals, with permission granted by the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Loke) against a decision made by First-tier Tribunal Judge Skehan on 8 January 2020. By that decision, Judge Skehan ("the judge") allowed an appeal which had been brought by Mr Singh against decisions made by the respondent on 9 August 2014 and 4 December 2014.
To avoid confusion, I shall refer to the parties as they were before the FtT: Mr Singh as the appellant and the Secretary of State for the Home Department as the respondent.
The appellant entered the United Kingdom on 26 October 2009. He held entry clearance as a Tier 4 (General) Student Migrant which was valid from 15 October 2009 to 30 August 2013.
You are specifically considered a person who has sought leave to remain in the United Kingdom by deception following information provided to us by Education Testing Service, that on 17 July 2013 an anomaly with your speaking test indicated the presence of a proxy test taker.
Form IS151A Part 2, which bore the same date and accompanied the IS151A, stated that the appellant was entitled to appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (IAC) after he had left the United Kingdom. Directions were to be given for his removal to India.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.