Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Paul Emerson (instructed by Jeremy Simon & Co) for the Claimant Kim Franklin (instructed by Berrymans Lace Mawer) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 18 December 2008 ____________________
He rejected the charge of fraudulent invoicing made by the Stern Trustees. It followed that he found that Mr Stern's termination of Mr Levy's contract was wrongful.
Mr Levy's Counsel argued that there was no question of law decided. In effect all that the Arbitrator was doing was ruling upon a late application to amend which he refused. It was a procedural and discretionary decision which does not as such, she argued, give rise to a question of law.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.