Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the claimant was not racially harassed by the second-named respondent at a meeting on 9 February 2005.
The respondents were represented by Ms S Owens, Solicitor, of MSC Daly, Solicitors.
“ Whether the claimant was subjected to racial harassment by the second-named respondent at a meeting on 9 February 2005.”
The relevant law is found in the Race Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1997. In reaching its decision the tribunal also considered the case of Laing v Manchester City Council [28 July 2006] .
4.1 The claimant had worked for the first-named respondent as a security guard for in and around 16 years.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.