Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.  
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the Appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .  
              By way of a decision issued on 28 September 2023 I set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal to be remade.  
              The appellant and her sister attended the hearing. I heard further brief submissions from Mr. Pipe on the rule 43 application. Mrs. Arif agreed that the decision should be set aside for procedural error and did not challenge the appellant's application. Taking the application and submissions into account, and in accordance with rules 2 and 5 of the 2008 Rules, I set aside the decision dated 15 December 2023.
              I then heard submissions on the appellant's appeal on asylum grounds. I reserved my decision. It was confirmed by Mrs. Arif that the respondent's concession that the appeal should be allowed on Article 3 medical grounds remained. In relation to the appellant's protection claim the respondent continued to rely on his decision dated 23 March 2022, and the review dated 20 February 2023.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.