Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent: Mr Sharma, Counsel, instructed by Frances Stella Maris Solicitors LLP
              This is an appeal against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Richards-Clarke promulgated on 27 June 2023 allowing Ms Jarju's human rights appeal against a decision of the Entry Clearance Officer dated 28 November 2022 to refuse her entry to the United Kingdom as the child of a person present and settled in the United Kingdom. Permission to appeal was granted by First-tier Tribunal Judge Chohan on 24 July 2023.
              The grounds of appeal are as follows.
Ground 1 -Misdirection in law. The judge made a finding that the sponsor has failed to show that he can accommodate and maintain Ms Jarju without recourse to public funds. She therefore does not meet paragraph 297(iv) and (v) of the Immigration Rules.
Ground 2 - The judge's approach to paragraph A39 is flawed. The judge glosses over the importance of this. The fact that Ms Jarju has not provided the required TB certificate may jeopardise the UK population.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.