Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Whereas the original respondent is the appealing party, I shall, in the interests of convenience and consistency, replicate the nomenclature of the decision at first instance.
The appellant, born April 30, 1969 is a citizen of South Africa. On February 25, 2013 she submitted an application for entry clearance as a fianc�e of the sponsor, Kieran Moore. The respondent refused his application under the Immigration Rules on March 15, 2013 under Appendix FM and in particular section E-ECP 1.1(d).
The respondent lodged grounds of appeal on September 26, 2014 and on November 3, 2014 Upper Tribunal Judge Martin sitting as a Judge of the First-tier Tribunal granted permission to appeal finding it arguable the FtTJ may have erred by taking the decision she did because it was arguable the transitional provisions only applied to members of HM Armed Forces.
There was no Rule 24 response filed by the appellant and the matter came before me on the above date. The sponsor was in attendance and was represented.
Mr Walker and Mr Collins agreed that the grounds of appeal did not disclose any error in law.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.