Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 8 June 2000 Before
JUDGE WILCOX : This is an appeal against a decision of the Employment Tribunal to award no compensation following a finding of unfair dismissal. The Employment Tribunal held that the appellant would have been fairly dismissed if a proper procedure had been followed. There is no issue, therefore, as to the dismissal. It was an unfair dismissal and so found by the tribunal applying the proper test in law and giving and full reasons. It is as to the remedy that the appeal and submissions have been focused today. I go straightaway to the grounds of the appeal that are before us.
And then by way of amendment by leave today, further or alternatively, the Employment Tribunal erred in law in that it failed to give any or any proper reasons for its finding that the appellant would have been dismissed if a fair procedure had been followed.
I interpolate there that: is a reference to consultation procedures after the decision was taken. They continue:
They are all factors which relate to the appellant and those criteria and shortcomings in relation to evidence. They go on:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.