Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
��Bartosz Bartkowiak is the sole director of H4U (London) Limited (�H4U�), the Appellant in this case. The Respondent (�the Council�) is the enforcement authority which served a Final Notice on H4U.
��The Final Notice imposed on H4U a financial penalty of �5,000 for breach of the duty to display in its premises a list of fees including a statement whether H4U belongs to a client money protection scheme.
��By his Notice of Appeal, Mr Bartkowiak argues that the Council�s decision was wrong because H4U is not a letting agent.
��Mr Bartkowiak asked for a hearing of this matter rather than determination on the papers.
��At the hearing, Mr Bartkowiak attended, and represented H4U. The Council was represented by Katherine Forrest, Trading Standards Officer of the Council. Other members of the Council�s Trading Standards team were in attendance.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.